Description
Participants bring anonymized snippets from past decks and learn to mark claims as supported, directional, or speculative. Facilitators model constructive pushback language.
What is included
- Six two-hour modules
- Peer markup sessions
- Facilitator exemplar library
- Policy links appendix for common citations
- Capstone peer review day
Outcomes
- Apply the cohort claim taxonomy to new decks
- Run a peer review session without defensiveness spikes
- Archive supporting references in a shared activity log format
FAQ
All examples must be scrubbed; facilitators spot-check before group review.
Sessions rotate morning/evening Korea time; recordings available forty-eight hours.
Not a writing class for general prose—focus stays on evidentiary discipline.
Participant notes
The taxonomy cut our slide bloat by more than a third without dumbing down content.